Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Baily Hancock's avatar

Oh what I would give to live in any of those top 10 (or even top 15!) countries as an American. 😫

Expand full comment
Roger Sweeny's avatar

The Cantril Ladder does not measure happiness in the sense of feeling good. It measures acceptance or, at best, lack of dissatisfaction. A person who was in constant pain, constantly on the edge of starvation, and with no prospect of anything better would be a Cantril 10! "The top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you" and that is his best possible life.

To be more precise, it is what he perceives as his "best possible life". If he thought better things were possible, his Cantril happiness would go down. The happiest possible society would be one in which everyone thought it was impossible to get better, no matter how bad things were. By the Cantril measure, they would have the highest "overall quality of life" possible.

Reductio ad absurdum? Of course. But then most writing on happiness is absurd. No one wants to face the fact that the pursuit of happiness is a trick evolution plays to get us off our asses. As Lionel Page titled his first post on the issue, ""The truth About happiness: We are designed to long for it, not to get it"

https://www.optimallyirrational.com/p/the-truth-about-happiness

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts